The Fallacy of ‘Cosmetic’ Surgery for Trans People

A woman who was arrested last year for providing dangerous “butt enhancement” shots consisting of cement, caulk, tire sealant, and other toxic and troublesome substances is facing new charges as more victims come forward. I don’t know how many of this woman’s clients were trans, but I suspect that at least a few were.

The fact that this underground business is thriving – and destroying women’s health and lives – is a testament to the problem of classifying transition surgeries and other treatments as “cosmetic” as opposed to medically necessary.

In my opinion, no trans-related surgery or procedure should be classified as “cosmetic,” whether it’s chest reconstruction/augmentation, genital correction, facial feminization/masculinization surgery, or any other procedures related to transition.

There are certain treatments that are medically necessary for those people who need to transition and live in the world as their correct sex and gender. Some of those treatments might involve corrections to the body other than the standard “top” and “bottom” surgeries.

While both women and men come in many shapes and sizes, there are particular body shapes that reflect “femaleness,” including a rounded hip-and-butt area. For some trans women, this type of shape is important in their medical transition, both psychologically and functionally (consider the cut of women’s clothing compared to that of men’s).

We have seen how important it is because many specialty shops that cater to trans women offer padded undergarments and other prosthetic devices that provide this “female” appearance. We have also seen how important it is when we see the continued demand for illegal “butt enhancement” and similar procedures.

When there is a medical condition present (and we have seen, both through the policies of medical organizations and the findings in some legal cases, that the need to transition is a medical necessity), whatever surgeries and other procedures are necessary to correct, alleviate, or ease that condition should be considered medically necessary treatments. Those procedures might include silicone or fat injections, or, in the case of female-to-male transition, liposuction to correct body shape.

These procedures should be made available in the same way that any other medical procedure is made available and paid for by insurance or other health-care programs. Of course, that will still leave some people out, but it’s a start, and it might be a way to reduce backdoor (no pun intended) injections that leave people sick, disfigured, or even dead.

Certainly, the culture needs changing. Our standards of beauty need a serious overhaul. People – both men and women, trans and non-trans – should not feel compelled to get surgeries or other “beauty” treatments to create or maintain a facade simply because it is expected or valued by society.

People shouldn’t have to get Botox treatments or facelifts to get hired for or maintain a job, as many older executives are doing today. The media, the cosmetics companies, the pharmaceutical companies, and the advertising industry need to stop telling us what is attractive and what constitutes an acceptable and correct gender presentation.

But even if all this changes, which it won’t anytime soon, the need for people to transition will still exist. And until we recognize the full range of medically necessary procedures for trans people, these underground “practitioners” will continue to pop up and endanger people’s health and lives.

Readers – thoughts?

cross-posted from Tranifesto

3 Comments

  1. Jenny Howard March 26, 2012
  2. Lisa McDonald March 26, 2012
  3. Megan March 27, 2012

Add Comment

img_5800e5bd88d8a
Johns Hopkins Resumes Trans Care
DL-art
The New York Magazine lies to parents about trans children
92
The media is lying about why NC is being sued
91
What the US Attorney General actually said about trans people & fighting NC in court
transphobia5
The Politics of Transphobia
img_579a295a28d15
Is Sadism Popular With TERFs? A Chat With An Ex-Gendercrit
chai
EEOC Commissioner: “Contrary state or local laws provide no defense to an employer that violates Title VII”
85
Study: Trans kid’s gender implicit; govt report condemns conversion therapy
95c
The Gill Foundation & NCTE choose money over trans lives
KrellTitle
In Memory of Terri Williams Moore (1941–1976)
87
[Updated] Predatory publishers and their dupes
84
The NY Times goes concern trolling
95c
The Gill Foundation & NCTE choose money over trans lives
transphobia5
The Politics of Transphobia
86
Fight back: Report Mississippi & North Carolina HATE here!
CitizensForResponsiblePolicy_CreepyGuy
The 2008 Gainesville Bathroom Bill TV Spot Revisited