http://transadvocate.com/nexy/2010/02/02/with-the-beatles/ Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:44:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://transadvocate.com/nexy/2010/02/02/with-the-beatles/#comment-2542 nexy Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:51:53 +0000 http://transadvocate.com/nexy/?p=783#comment-2542 i find there are mostly two groups of people from this era - stones people and beatles people. i enjoy listening to many stones songs, but for me, the beatles were the best. to each their own, i suppose. i find there are mostly two groups of people from this era – stones people and beatles people. i enjoy listening to many stones songs, but for me, the beatles were the best. to each their own, i suppose.

]]> http://transadvocate.com/nexy/2010/02/02/with-the-beatles/#comment-2537 123 Sun, 28 Feb 2010 09:41:56 +0000 http://transadvocate.com/nexy/?p=783#comment-2537 perhaps they were "teh best", as a group of mostly constant members. otherwise the stones were 60's gen's best, but stones used session players a lot, plus had 5 members and got mick taylor after brian jones "went". the stones good sh1t lasts longer htan the beatles' largely because the stones put more into each track. but the beatles made very good pop using only "simple" parts. plus they did some pretty "weird" stuff (eg, "tomorrow never knows" which is also one of their best) perhaps they were “teh best”, as a group of mostly constant members. otherwise the stones were 60′s gen’s best, but stones used session players a lot, plus had 5 members and got mick taylor after brian jones “went”.
the stones good sh1t lasts longer htan the beatles’ largely because the stones put more into each track. but the beatles made very good pop using only “simple” parts. plus they did some pretty “weird” stuff (eg, “tomorrow never knows” which is also one of their best)

]]>