
the new york post reports that a yeshiva university professor left two years ago on leave, and returned today as a woman. since judaism, in my opinion, is at the root of modern judeo-christian “disapproval” of all things trans and gay, one can imagine the reaction of some members of the staff and faculty.
“He’s not a woman. He’s a male with enlarged breasts,” said Rabbi Moshe Tendler, a senior dean at Yeshiva’s rabbinical school and a professor of biology and medical ethics. “He’s a person who represents a kind of amorality which runs counter to everything Yeshiva University stands for. There is just no leeway in Jewish law for a transsexual.
“There is no niche where he can hide out as a female without being in massive violation of Torah law, Torah ethics and Torah morality.”
holy mortal sin, batman! of course, the new york post doesn’t waste a second reporting the most important aspects of this story:
Literature Professor Joy Ladin, formerly known as Jay Ladin, 47, showed up for her first day of school sporting pink lipstick, a tight purple shirt and a flirty black skirt. She cheerfully strutted through the doors of the Midtown campus’ main building, where she oversees the writing center.
um, a skirt that hits below the knees is “flirty”? perhaps the new york post’s “journalist” rebecca rosenberg needs to get out a bit more. the article goes on to say:
Many at the Jewish university are horrified by the presence of the transgender professor. Some fear the news could cut alumni donations.
there you have it - the real meat of the story. the jews are horrified that money will be lost.
holy stereotypes, batman!

Why is it that only trans women can “sport” a particular shade of lipstick and have it be newsworthy? Did anyone comment on what shade of lipstick Sarah Palin wore during her acceptance speech last week?
Ugh.
Comment by Michelle — September 10, 2008 @ 6:33 am
apparently, it’s also newsworthy that she “cheerfully strutted” into work. perhaps before transition, she only “indifferently galloped” or something.
Comment by nexy — September 10, 2008 @ 8:00 am
The only way that skirt could possibly be considered flirty is if the dress requirement for the school was remeniscent of the nineteenth century. Ridiculous.
Comment by A.W. — September 11, 2008 @ 11:38 am
This is what is perhaps the most frustrating thing about being trans. If you come across as to girly you are feeding into the stereotype of what it means to be a woman. Conversely, if you aren’t quite into all that girly stuff, well, you aren’t a real woman. It’s enough to make me want to just go shopping.
Comment by Kelly — September 20, 2008 @ 3:01 pm