Becky’s Blog

Rebecca Juro - Writer, Activist, Radio Talk Show Host

Tonight on the Rebecca Juro Show: Justin Tanis

Posted in Uncategorized on May 8th, 2008

Tonight, we’ll talk with Justin Tanis, the National Center for Transgender Equality’s Program Director and co-author of the new publication “Opening the Door to the Inclusion of  Transgender People”, which offers advice to organizations seeking to become more transgender-inclusive. We’ll talk to Justin about “Opening the Door…”, trans-politics, and more!

The Rebecca Juro Show
The LGBT Internet Radio Talk Show That Puts The “T” First!
Streaming Live Thursdays, 7-10pm Eastern, 4-7pm Pacific And Rebroadcast Throughout The Week
On QMO
http://www.queermusiconline.com
And Live Every Week
On WKJCE TLGB Radio
http://www.wkjce.org
Studio Call-In Line: (928)257-3171
Show Email: rjuroshow@gmail.com
Podcast Archive: Homepage: http://beckyjuro.podomatic.com

RSS Feed:http://beckyjuro.podOmatic.com/rss2.xml

Becky’s Blog: http://transadvocate.com/beckygrrl
NEW! Show Website: http://rebeccajuro.com

Tonight On The Rebecca Juro Show: Open Phones!

Posted in Uncategorized on May 1st, 2008

Tonight it’s open phones, taking your calls on a variety of important topics and issues in the LGB, and especially T, community.

Rye Seronie, our Digital Diva, and Studio Producer Mike Scott are now roomies! Will the show ever be the same? Tune in and find out!

Barney Balks, but Rosen Responds! Barney Frank’s office turned down an interview request to appear on the show, one that was encouraged live on the air by one of Frank’s top aides, Joe Racalto. The good news is that Hilary Rosen, former interim Executive Director of the Human Rights Campaign, and member of the Board of the Human Rights Campaign Fund will join us on the May 22nd show.  I blogged about it, and I’ll talk about tonight.

Plus news, commentary, and more…plus your phone calls!

Host
The Rebecca Juro Show
The LGBT Internet Radio Talk Show That Puts The “T” First!
Streaming Live Thursdays, 7-10pm Eastern, 4-7pm Pacific And Rebroadcast Throughout The Week
On QMO
http://www.queermusiconline.com
And Live Every Week
On WKJCE TLGB Radio
http://www.wkjce.org
Studio Call-In Line: (928)257-3171
Show Email: rjuroshow@gmail.com
Podcast Archive: Homepage: http://beckyjuro.podomatic.com

RSS Feed:http://beckyjuro.podOmatic.com/rss2.xml

Becky’s Blog: http://transadvocate.com/beckygrrl
NEW! Show Website: http://rebeccajuro.com

Barney Won’t Talk To Us

Posted in Uncategorized on April 25th, 2008

Never let it be said I didn’t give it my best effort.

During a surprise call-in during my March 6th show featuring Donna Rose, Joe Racalto, an aide in Congressman Barney Frank’s office, suggested I contact him to set up an interview with Congressman Frank to discuss ENDA and the issue of transgender rights in general. Of course, I was interested. I contacted Joe soon afterward and began the process of requesting and setting up the interview. Unfortunately, it seems Joe overestimated the willingness of his boss to speak directly to the transgender community and and enter into the kind of dialog with us that he’s advocated publicly for so long.

Earlier today, I got my answer. Apparently, Congressman Frank, who always seems to find the time to talk Queer politics on the air on the Michelangelo Signorile Show, apparently can’t seem to find even a few minutes to come on a show like mine which focuses on topics and issues of concern to transgender and gender-variant Americans. Personally, I was hoping to have the opportunity to ask Congressman Frank some long-unanswered questions about these issues instead of maybe a gender-relevant question or two in the midst of a round of the same tired open-ended softballs Signorile always seems lob Frank’s way whenever he appears on his show.

I guess it’s really not all that surprising when you think about it. I’m not Michelangelo Signorile. Unlike I’ve heard Signorile do so often in the past, if Barney Frank tried to avoid answering my direct questions about these issues which are so important to so many in our community, I’d call him on it and push for answers, not let him just go on saying whatever he wanted to say for as long as he wanted without challenge. After all, if Congressman Frank’s not going to respond to our questions fully and directly, what’s the point in having him on in the first place?

And hey, let’s not forget we’re not really his target audience. Apparently, he only really wants to speak to the monied gay elite, and that’s what he gets when he goes on the Signorile show. Like so many politicians, Frank talks a great line when he’s the one leading the discussion, but it seems he isn’t so willing to respond to the questions and concerns of those American citizens who are most directly impacted by what he and his colleagues in Congress are doing in regards to ENDA and LGBT civil rights in general.

Honestly, it’s kind of funny when you think about it. Democrats go on the shows of the right-wingers and go toe-to-toe with these people all the time, but apparently Barney Frank is shying away from speaking with those who’s interests he claims to be representing in Congress. Or, could it be me…lil’ ol’ me? Am I really scarier for Barney Frank than Bill O’Reilly or Sean Hannity…or even Michelangelo Signorile?

Maybe I really am that scary, at least for someone like Barney Frank. Maybe it’s that I’m just not willing to drink down a Big Gulp-size helping of Congressional Kool-Aid. Maybe it’s that I’m not afraid to call ‘em as I see ‘em, even when doing so inconveniences activists and politicians who probably prefer I’d just shut the hell up. Maybe it’s that he knows I’d ask questions he’s not going to want to answer and I’m not going to be satisfied with a politically-neutered dodge as a response. Or, maybe he just doesn’t think we’re important enough to bother with.

Fear not, however. Just because Barney Frank isn’t willing to be questioned by me and my listeners about these critical issues, it doesn’t mean everyone involved in mainstream and LGBT politics feels the need to run the other way. It took a while to finally get it together, but I’m pleased to announce that Hilary Rosen, Board member of the Human Rights Campaign Fund, and former interim director of the organization (in-between Cheryl Jacques and Joe Solmonese), will be my guest on the May 22nd edition of “The Rebecca Juro Show”.

I’ve been hoping to get some opposing, or at least not completely agreeing, guests to come on my show and take on some of these issues, but until now, it’s only been Chris Crain, former Editor in Chief of the Washington Blade, and Dana Beyer, a transwoman, former and future political candidate in the State of Maryland, and a member of HRC’s Board of Governors, who had been willing to take me up on the offer. Speaking to and with the choir can only take us just so far, so I’ve been trying to make it point to get people like Dana Beyer and Hilary Rosen on the show to offer listeners a different perspective. While I’m quite sure many of us will disagree with some or even all of what Ms. Rosen has to say, she has both my respect and my appreciation for being willing to step up and enter into a discussion of these issues, a discussion Barney Frank apparently really has no interest in having despite his many public statements to the contrary.

I’m looking forward to my discussion with Hilary Rosen. I think it’ll be an interesting and informative show, and I think she’ll be a terrific guest. I just think it’s a pity that Barney Frank isn’t willing follow her example and take even a few minutes to speak directly to the community most significantly impacted by his advocacy of ENDA in Congress.

I guess it’s a good thing, in a twisted sort of way. For all those gender-variant Americans who may have had their doubts as to whether or not Barney Frank was really committed to seeing them protected from discrimination under federal law, you’ve now got your answer from Congressman Frank in as unmistakable a manner as possible, spoken in a voice as loud and as clear as silence.

Money Changes (Almost) Everything

Posted in Uncategorized on April 21st, 2008

Recently, there’s been much discussion about how we go forward in dealing with the Human Rights Campaign as a community, where the popular opinion of the greater LGBT community, and probably of nearly all of those who identify as transgender or gender-variant in some way, is that this organization simply cannot be trusted to reflect and advocate in concert with the will of the majority. One of the most common assertions, one I believe has been repeatedly proven conclusively accurate over the last several months, is that HRC’s leadership not only simply doesn’t get it, but they really show little or no interest in getting it in the future.

It’s not quite as complex a problem as some would have you believe. Indeed, what they don’t get is really quite simple. When you consider that in order to be a part of the organization’s leadership, to have decision-making and agenda-setting power at HRC, one must raise or donate fifty thousand dollars a year, the answer is as simple as it is obvious: The problem is money.

Think about how much personal wealth one must have in order to generate this level of donation to HRC. Can someone with that kind of cash in the bank possibly understand what it is to have to live on a budget, to have to make economically-dictated decisions between what one wants, what one needs, and what one can afford? Can someone who can simply write a donation check for more than twice as much as many of us make in a year really understand what is to have to pay the bills working a low-paying job at a local retailer or the impact that losing such a job because of bigotry has on those who depend on such relatively meager incomes to survive?

The answer, of course, is yes. Not everyone with money is born into it, and many wealthy people proactively educate themselves and use their financial clout to help make things better for others not so fortunate. The real question, however, is not if it’s possible that someone so wealthy can possibly understand the reality of the lives of the vast majority of Americans who don’t enjoy that level of wealth, but rather if it’s likely, and the answer to that question is clearly a resounding “No!”.

To put it in perspective, consider how many of us, probably most, view the issue of Darfur. It’s commonly understood that the people there are suffering greatly, but how many of us actually do anything about it in a concrete way? How many of us actually donate money, speak out on the topic, or take some kind of action to help alleviate the suffering of that country’s people? I’m willing to bet not very many. Most of us are just too involved with our own lives and issues to devote much time and attention to a problem and a people who seem so far away and far removed from our own lives.

The problem we gender-variant folks face in dealing with HRC bears striking similarities to how the tragedy of Darfur is popularly perceived by the American public at large. No doubt there are many on the HRC Executive Board who would agree that the persecution and discrimination of gender-variant Americans is awful in principle, but how many of those folks really care enough about us to devote their time, effort, and resources to helping to solve it? If history is to be our guide, then clearly the answer must be not very many at all.

I mean, how is it that after all these years of claiming to represent gender-variant Americans and our interests in Washington, this organization still needs to hold trainings to educate its own membership on transgender and gender-variant issues? How is it possible, or even rational, that such an organization, which is clearly incapable of even getting its own membership up to speed on these issues, could be relied upon to advocate these issues to the United States Congress? The obvious answer is that they can’t, not by any reasonable stretch, and anyone who tries to claim otherwise is either lying or or clueless.

Even more convincing evidence of HRC’s lack of both credibility and competency in advocating on behalf of gender-variant Americans is the reality that since Donna Rose left the organization late last year, no effort has apparently been made to replace her on the Executive Board. Instead, HRC tries to convince transpeople that appointing two new trans members to their non-political Business Council somehow makes up for the complete void of transgender and even simply lower, middle, and working class voices in their actual leadership.

HRC is, simply put, an organization run by rich gays for the benefit of rich gays. Period. End of story. It’s an organization so arrogant and so completely out of touch with the pulse of what’s really going on in the 99% of LGBT America that can’t write fifty thousand dollar yearly checks to the organization just to have a voice in its administration, that they can’t even get their own people to take the time to fully understand what they claim to be fighting for.

Even worse, HRC’s leadership thinks we’re all morons. How else can you explain them trying to claim that they’re fighting for and representing our interests in Congress while at the very same time continuing to support and actively promote legislation that will give people like those on their Executive Board protections in the workplace, but exclude gender-variant Americans from those selfsame protections, and even proactively penalizing legislators who support those protections and vote in concert with those beliefs in their ratings on the organization’s Congressional Scorecard? Could there possibly be any clearer proof of HRC’s incompetence to represent our community effectively? Actually, yes…there’s even more.

The Human Rights Campaign has been around since 1980, and after nearly three decades of their existence, what does our community have to show for their leadership of our movement?

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, which precipitated the largest anti-gay witch hunt in the history of the US military.

The Defense of Marriage Act, cited by governments and corporations alike to justify denying equal rights, benefits, and treatment to LGBT Americans all over this country.

45 states with laws or constitutional bans prohibiting same-sex marriage and/or domestic partnerships and civil unions.

Failure after failure after failure. If any employee had this kind of performance record in private industry, they’d have long since been fired. Any company with this track record would have been forced out of business decades ago. And yet, somehow, most of the membership of the US Congress, presumably highly intelligent men and women all, somehow still perceive this organization as not only credible, but as representing the majority will of the American LGBT community.

Forrest Gump’s mother had it right: Stupid is as stupid does.

Put all the lies, betrayals, and other disgraceful indignities HRC has visited upon gender-variant Americans over the years on the shelf for a moment, and even then you still have this simple, undeniable reality:

The Human Rights Campaign is completely and utterly incompetent as a political advocate, not only in representing the interests of the gender-variant, but also those of gay and lesbians as well. No matter what yardstick you choose to use, HRC not only doesn’t measure up in terms of helping to achieve positive political progress for LGBT Americans, but its leadership of our movement has made our situation incalculably worse than it was before.

Of course, it all comes back to money…cold, hard, cash. They have it, we don’t, and it’s the one and only thing they have going for them. It’s what makes the politicians listen, and it’s the one and only language the people making the decisions at HRC speak.

To those still supporting this organization with their donation dollars, I say this: If you really want to see equality for people like us anytime soon, you need to put your money where it will actually do some good. Organizations like NGLTF can’t win every battle, but at least they don’t have a unbroken thirty-year record of not only complete failure to make any positive progress at all, but also an almost equally consistent record of losing ground in the form of laws that now formally enshrine second and even third-class status for LGBT Americans in ninety percent of American states.

Have we had enough yet?

Money, while certainly useful, does not equal competency or credibility. It’s time to give HRC their richly-deserved pink slip and hire some people who know what the hell they’re doing.

Tonight on The Rebecca Juro Show: Dana Beyer

Posted in Uncategorized on April 17th, 2008

Tonight, we’ll talk with former candidate for Maryland State Delegate and HRC Board of Governors member Dr. Dana Beyer. One of of the very few transpeople still associated with HRC, and certainly the highest-ranking transperson in the organization, we’ll talk with Dr. Beyer about HRC, ENDA, the future of the movement, and much more!

Plus news, commentary, and your phone calls!

The Rebecca Juro Show
The LGBT Internet Radio Talk Show That Puts The “T” First!
Streaming Live Thursdays, 7-10pm Eastern, 4-7pm Pacific And Rebroadcast Throughout The Week
On QMO
http://www.queermusiconline.com
And Live Every Week
On WKCJE TLGB Radio
http://www.wkjce.org
Studio Call-In Line: (928)257-3171
Show Email: rjuroshow@gmail.com

NEW! Show Website: http://rebeccajuro.com

Ok, so…maybe not.

Posted in Uncategorized on April 12th, 2008

If you haven’t read the previous post, read it now. If you have, then let’s go:

The election is over. Casting myself in the Obama role turned out to be some pretty wishful thinking. It seems I was closer to Kucinich, splitting six votes with two other candidates, while the other two tied each other with nine votes each. We then had a runoff between these two, the one who wanted it bad and someone who is a good friend and the candidate I voted had for the first time since I was not allowed to vote for myself.

Once eliminated in the first round of voting, I became my friend’s campaign manager, coaching her on what to talk about and to whom. She was a true champ, never lowering herself into the worst of it even when she was directly attacked by a supporter of her opponent. Her opponent never attacked her directly, but really kept the heat on through surrogates, and doing her best to swing as many votes as she could her way.

It was really quite an interesting scene. Remember, this is all going on among dominant women…talk about clashing egos! The attacks were overt and subtle, angry and calm, reasoned and enraged. The slaves, not having a vote of course, for the most part smartly stayed pretty much completely out of the whole thing. This was a battle among an elite group for political dominance, and it was a battle my team won, even though I didn’t snare the top prize for myself. I proudly watched our new Queen be crowned, and I happily danced at the party in her honor later in the day. Not surprisingly, her opponent, the woman who wanted it so badly, who had lost in the runoff by just one vote, didn’t show up at the coronation or the celebration, and neither did most of her entourage of slaves. Call it a hunch, but I have a feeling that this battle is far from over. When you have an election every three months until someone is elected three times in a row, there’s not a lot of time not to have at least some kind of political drama going on. Considering how much of it we had before, I can only imagine it’s going to get even more intense now.

So what now?

Well, I’m happy with the result. I think she’ll be a fine Queen, better than the next most likely alternative by a long shot. I’m also still one of the most powerful people on the sim. Within the roleplay, I answer only to the Queen, and outside of the roleplay only the Queen and the slave male who runs the business end of the sim. It’s not too bad a consolation prize when you think about it. Not only that but the Queen is a friend and shares my opinion on the way most things at the sim should be run…at least, I think so anyway.

Will I run again in three months? To be honest, I can’t say with certainty either way right now. I’d like to, but I’ll only do it if I think it’s in the best interests of the sim. It’ll probably take at least a few weeks to determine if we’ve got a keeper here. In any case, I have a feeling this drama is far from over.

I Wanna Be Elected

Posted in Uncategorized on March 31st, 2008

The last time I wrote about my experiences in Second Life, I talked about the femdom site where I work as a Mistress who plays a certain role in the political hierarchy of the sim, and I also talked about B., my male sub. B. and I unfortunately haven’t seen a lot of each other lately, but many new developments have been keeping me busy in SL.

I’ve risen in rank in terms of social political power and influence in this roleplay scenario, as have others. When I last wrote, I was in a role that was much like that held by most of those who work at the sim. Now, I am one of the leaders of that group. This scenario is a monarchy, but since the sim opened about two months ago, there has been no Queen. In an interesting twist of political structural dynamics, our monarchy is about elect its first Queen. There are five candidates announced, and I am one of them. The voting begins tomorrow, April 1st, and runs through April 5th.

Along with my higher position and my candidacy for Queen, I’ve also gained something else: A personal slave, a female. S. is with me a lot of the time I’m at the sim, and yes, we mess around. It’s great fun and, I believe, a satisfying relationship for both of us. While B., my male slave, is not really involved with the roleplay at the sim unless he just happens to be visiting, S. is and has been intimately involved with it and is certainly part of our greater core “family” of participants, the people who show up regularly and reliably, staff as well as members.

What’s most interesting here is the political gamesmanship going on just under the surface. As a candidate, I find myself in delicate little passive-aggressive debates with other candidates which just happen to be within earshot of at least one of the 28 women who currently have the right to vote in this election.

One of the women running really wants to win this thing, and she wants it bad, you can tell. She’s been the most aggressive and serious campaigner of all of us in an election where we’re really running to be the Queen of Fun, or perhaps Satisfaction. Personally, I’ve taken a different approach.

My role at the sim brings me into contact with a lot of the people who come there so I use that to simply talk to those who want to talk and get myself known and out there for voters to see. The group I co-run is very visible on the sim, even more than I myself can be.

The funny thing about all this is that when I take a step back and see it from a real-world perspective it’s kind of, not exactly but kind of, not completely unlike the Democratic primaries condensed to a microcosm. We’ve got the Hillary character, so does this mean I’ve got the Obama role in this election?

Well, maybe.

There no formal polls here, no insights other than through word-of-mouth to be able to glean any insight into who is more or less popular among this electorate. The woman who wants it bad has her supporters I’m sure, and I know I have mine as well. This is real old-time politicking, no media between the message and the voters. The other candidates are good, too, and I expect they will drawing their share of votes as well.

With an electorate so small, swaying just a few people could mean the difference between a win and a loss and yet despite that, I just can’t get too worked up about the whole thing. Yes, I’m running for Queen, but if I take this too seriously, as seriously as others perhaps do, it might stop being fun. In the end, that’s what it’s all really about, fun.

People get enough work in their real lives, and indeed, there are some who make enough that they actually live off of what they make in SL and for whom money is a legitimate motivator. The vast majority of jobs in SL, though, should serve a valid function but they must also ultimately be fun to do or ithey will not be something too many will actively engage in. Considering how little most SL jobs pay in comparison to employment in the real world, there has to be more compensation than just a few US dollars worth of Lindens every few weeks in order to get people to come time and time again.

The key is fun. Fun, fun, fun. If it’s fun and satisfying for everyone, everyone comes back for more. If it isn’t, people move on to the next place…and in SL, there always seems to be a next place. There need to be rules, but they shouldn’t be oppressive…except to the subs, of course. That’s why a certain level of seriousness about this election is a warning sign, one that should probably be heeded.

If I become Queen, it’ll be one of the fastest rises to power in history considering where I started, but then it seems like everything in SL happens at an accelerated rate. I can’t help considering the possibilities of what it would mean if I won. Not only all that, but also how completely different it would be from my real life. Not that the prelude to that possibility is any less completely different from my first life.

While we have no formal debates or anything, each candidate did issue a platform statement, a “vote for me, here what I’ll do…” kind of thing, and those were distributed to all the eligible voters. What little scuttlebutt I’ve heard is that I have a lot of support. How much I don’t really know but I know it’s out there.

It all starts tomorrow. My first election as an actual candidate. Win or lose, it’s going to be unique.

Tonight On The Rebecca Juro Show: Alex Blaze

Posted in Uncategorized on March 27th, 2008

Tonight we’re taking on the hot LGBT topics of the day with the Bilerico Project’s Managing Editor Alex Blaze!

ENDA! Hillary! Barack! Barney! Pregnant Men!

Plus lots more!

It’s the “Rebecca Juro Show, tonight at 7pm eastern, 4pm pacific! Don’t miss it!

The Rebecca Juro Show
The LGBT Internet Radio Talk Show That Puts The “T” First!
Streaming Live Thursdays, 7-10pm Eastern, 4-7pm Pacific And Rebroadcast Throughout The Week
On QMO
http://www.queermusiconline.com
And Live Every Week
On WKCJE TLGB Radio
http://www.wkjce.org
Studio Call-In Line: (928)257-3171
Show Email: rjuroshow@gmail.com

NEW! Show Website: http://rebeccajuro.com

Beck To Work

Posted in Uncategorized on March 22nd, 2008

You may have been wondering why you haven’t seen much in the way of postings from me in the last several weeks (or not). The truth is that I’ve been looking for a new job during this time, and about a month ago, something that hadn’t happened for almost three years finally did, in fact, happen: I was hired.

It’s the bottom of the totem pole, yet again. After my disastrous experience with my last employer, I felt it best to completely eliminate that job, and therefore the relevant managerial experience it represented, from my resume. As a result, I’m back to journeywoman retail worker status. I’m a part-time employee at this point, but I’m already working around the same number of hours as the fulltimers do. My hope is that they’ll eventually offer me full-time and later, I’ll be in a good position to move up in this company.

It’s one of those “big box” retail specialty stores, one of the better ones. What’s most interesting to me, as a twenty-year-plus retail veteran, is not what they sell as much as how they sell it. It has to be the single most positive place I’ve ever worked.The entire culture of the company is geared toward success as a team, as a company and as a store. It’s a good culture model for retail, one I’ve seen work well elsewhere. It’s also a component important enough that when it’s lacking a store suffers as a result.

It’s by no means perfect, of course. None of these massive-sized companies ever are. This particular company employs a lot of teenagers as low-level crew, and if there’s anything I’ve learned from over twenty years working in retail as both crew and management staff, it’s that when you hire children to staff your stores, it should be no surprise when those staff members behave in manner consistent with their age. While some teenagers certainly are mature enough to not only do a good job, but also conduct themselves professionally in the workplace, others clearly are not, and it’s often not until these kids are hired and working that you can really discover which is which.

With my experience, I find myself placing personal bets with myself as to which of these kids will stay with the company through college and maybe even into adulthood, and which ones will quit, or start having attendance or performance problems that will eventually result in their being fired. The latter are easy to spot, especially for someone like myself who’s managed crews of teens before. It’s the kids for whom everything in their lives takes priority over their job, school (understandable), family events (questionable, but also understandable to a point), friends and entertainment (inexplicable, especially when an employee calls out because of a purely social event), or call out sick but then somehow show up the next day perfectly healthy and ready to work, who are the ones I put my money on to not be able to make it over the long haul.

Of course, these kids don’t live on what they make on the job. Mom and Dad are paying for the essentials, for the most part these kids are working for pocket money. There’s nothing wrong with that, of course, but it does help explain why their work ethics are often so bad. What’s even more inexplicable than the teens attitudes toward their jobs, however, are the parents.

When I was working as a manager, it was often my job to call these kids at home when they didn’t show up for their shift. While some parents understood completely why attendance is an issue, other parents would defend their kids, assuming that all that was needed for them to be excused at the last minute was an OK from Mom or Dad. I had parents coming into my store enraged that their child had been fired for poor attendance, or would just call the store and tell me that they were taking the family somewhere on vacation, so sorry their child would not be coming in this week, and they’d be infuriated when we’d tell them that since their child had not arranged to take the time off in advance, they would not have their job waiting when they returned. So many of these parents refused to make a distinction between their child’s school and their job, insisting that parental permission should be all that was needed to excuse their son or daughter from work for as long as they deemed necessary. When I would point out that such an excuse would likely not fly with their own employers, these parents would insist that it was different for them and demand that we make an exception to the rules because they, the parent, authorized it, and if it was good enough for their high school it should be good enough for us.

As someone who lives off of what she makes in this industry, I personally find this kind of attitude incomprehensible. Add to that my own personal issues with finding an employer willing to hire me for reasons that have nothing to do with my resume or work performance, and I find myself with little or no patience for those who don’t take their jobs seriously or value just having one to go to in the first place.

Funny thing is, this is actually a good thing for me. By starting out yet again in the same relative position as these kids, I look far better by comparison. I show up on time, I work hard, I take every opportunity to learn more about my job, and thus far, at least, I’ve never missed a day of work. I’ve risen through the ranks in retail three times thus far, and I fully expect I’ll do it again once I’ve been working at this store a while, become fully up to speed on what I need to know that’s specific to the company I’m now working for, and have clearly demonstrated that I’m not only reliable in the general sense, but I can also be counted on to do a good job in any position they put me in.

I’m also fortunate in that the trans thing just doesn’t seem to be an issue at this company in even the slightest way. HRC has rated this company one of the best for LGBT workers (yeah, yeah, I know, but in this case they happen to be right), and that shows itself in every aspect of my experience on the job thus far. Knowing that makes things much easier, as I can operate on the presumption that it’s my doing a good job and showing how capable I am that will determine my success with this company, not how I happen to show up for work. And again, it doesn’t hurt that it’s easy for me to shine in comparison to many of those on my level. It’s how I’ve risen through the ranks in the past in both genders, and it’s how I’ll do it this time.

One of the great things about this job is that my gender is never questioned in even the slightest way. I don’t kid myself that it’s because I pass perfectly. Anyone with half a brain, and certainly anyone who works with me for any length of time has to know I’m not your average female employee. Yet, I’ve never heard a slip of a pronoun, an unkind or even cautious word, an editing of a conversation, or anything that could lead me to believe that I’m seen as anything than a woman, not from the staff and not even from the customers.

Even more interesting is that I don’t feel pressured to check myself either. It’s not that I would ever make my transsexual status a topic of conversation, but at the same time if it were to come up somehow I wouldn’t feel any pressure to edit myself. A gay man I work with often refers to his boyfriend in conversation, and once, when we were discussing the Middle East and how LGBT’s and women are treated there, I joked that I could only imagine how they’d treat someone like me. The joke got a chuckle and the conversation moved on, as if it were completely normal and natural. Even at another store where I was treated well, I could never make such a joke. Such things were known, but never referred to in public…it just wasn’t done.

I really have to wonder if it’s the company culture, the ever-evolving social culture, or perhaps something else entirely. The fact that even the customers don’t seem to notice or care leads me to believe it’s a bit of both . The day I went in for my orientation session with one of the store managers, I and the other new employees at the session were shown several videos, including one about discrimination and harassment, how to recognize them for what they are, why it’s wrong and why it’s not tolerated on the job. The video was shown in segments, followed by a discussion of each segment to drive home the points made. It was the first time I’d ever seen such a direct and significant effort made to prevent this kind of thing from happening in the workplace, and it fills me with hope that if one of the nation’s largest and most successful retailers is already doing this, it’ll increasingly become the standard as time goes on.

So, you may be asking, if I’m so busy at work now that I’ve been all but absent from Bilerico and my blog these past several weeks, how do I have the time to be sitting here writing about it now? Because lucky me, for the first time since I’ve been working there, I’ve actually got three glorious days off in a row. That gives me a little time to catch up on stuff, finish this piece I’ve been writing for the last week in drib and drabs as I’ve had time, and basically just relax a little.

It’s nice to be able to think about the future in the longterm again. I could see myself staying with this company for a long time, and that’s something I don’t think I could have said about any other job I’ve had since I transitioned. For the first time since that monumental, life-altering decision, I go to work looking to prove myself based solely on my abilities and the quality of my work, not worried about how my gender identity and expression will be seen by those I work for, and how or if it might impact my opportunities for advancement or even continued employment. It may seem like a minor, or even silly thing to some, but to me it’s almost as freeing as how I felt the day I began living full-time as myself.

Is it just me, is it the company I work for, or it is that society in general is just becoming more accepting and tolerant on the whole? Personally, I prefer to think it’s all three, but in the end, it really doesn’t matter. What matters is that I like what I do, I’m good at it, I can make at least a reasonable living doing it, and most of all, I can now look toward the future without being afraid of my past getting in the way.

All in all, it’s a pretty decent way to make a living.

Tonight On The Rebecca Juro Show: Marti Abernathey and Rye Seronie

Posted in Uncategorized on March 20th, 2008

The team is back in full swing as Marti and Rye join me tonight for good fun and good conversation! Plus, your phone calls!

Barney Frank: First he’s against inclusive workplace legislation, then he’s for it, then he’s against it, and now he’s for it again! Will the flip-flop ever stop?

Desperation, thy name is Hillary. There’s almost no way she can win the nomination on delegates now. Is she still a viable candidate or is it time for her to step aside and let the Party unite around Obama?

Plus lots more!

It’s the “Rebecca Juro Show, tonight at 7pm eastern, 4pm pacific! Don’t miss it!

The Rebecca Juro Show
The LGBT Internet Radio Talk Show That Puts The “T” First!
Streaming Live Thursdays, 7-10pm Eastern, 4-7pm Pacific And Rebroadcast Throughout The Week
On QMO
http://www.queermusiconline.com
And Live Every Week
On WKCJE TLGB Radio
http://www.wkjce.org
Studio Call-In Line: (928)257-3171
Show Email: rjuroshow@gmail.com

NEW! Show Website: http://rebeccajuro.qmoradio.com