In the mode as a credentialed new media reporter for Pam’s House Blend, I’ll be heading up to Los Angeles early tomorrow morning to cover the Equality Summit. It’s billed as follows:

The Equality Summit is a gathering of community leaders committed to winning back marriage equality in California to network, share information and resources, and plan next steps.

You can read about the goals of the Equality Summit here.

Personally, I’m extremely pleased to see in the schedule that I there is a transgender interest/constituency group listed for the 11:30 AM breakout session. About to the same level that I’m pleased seeing the transgender specific breakout session, I’m concerned that I don’t see the phrase lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender used anywhere in the description, goals, or anywhere else on the webpage for the summit.

My concern stems from the lesson I took away from watching the film Milk: The LGBT community must be visible with our identifications in our political campaigns, and seeing that the phrase lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender is used in our campaigns is paramount. The lack of on the phrase lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender on the summit’s webpage seems like a huge omission.

To me, clarity matters; inclusivity matters; and language matters.

There are going to be a lot of mainstream and new media reporters at the event who are likely going to do a good job in covering the main thrusts of the Equality Summit. As someone who identifies and transsexual and transgender, I’m going to cover from a very militantly trans and you-”leaders”-better-say-the-phrase-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender perspective.

How I’m going to report goes to the core of what blogging is — new media reporting is reporting with a visible agenda.

I’ve been preparing for the summit this week. For those who follow my tweets on twitter, you know that I recently bought a new RCA Small Wonder just for covering events like the Equality Summit. I’ve been trying to figure out today who I want to get one or two minute interviews with, and what’s the one or two questions I’m going to ask all of those folk I have an opportunity to get on camera.

And hey, I like even steamed the wrinkles out of two blouses for wearing tomorrow! — I haven’t decided whether to go with a light blue or a white blouse. Hardly a world-shattering decision to make on blouses to wear, but I really do need to look somewhat professional at the summit.

It’s going to be a really long day, Saturday. The summit starts at 7:45 AM PST, and is scheduled to close at 7:30 PM. Add to it a 2-1/2 to 3 hour drive each direction from San Diego.

So hopefully I’ll have some interviews and a report or two from the summit up tomorrow. If not, Sunday for sure we’ll have something up.

~~~~~
Related:
* January Prop 8-related summit will restrict media access?
* Wockner: Equality Summit drops restrictions on media
* Taking A Short Break To Think About Freedom To Marry
* Writing A Toast; Being A Maid Of Honor
* Marriage Equality Beyond Just Gays And Lesbians

No doubt, be considerate of Sandy’s sense of esthetics and get a (“complete”?) make-over — before using the Ladies’ Room in Gainesville …

~~~~~

Related …

Fla. Conservatives Fight Transgender Restroom Rule

Stop right there, ma’am … er, sir

I don’t get this at all. I got a note from Twitter this morning:

Stacy L. Harp (stacyharp) is now following your updates on Twitter.

This Stacy L. Harp of Active Christian Media.

I can’t imagine that I’m a significant enough blogger for any consevative “Christian” media type to keep an eye on me on Twitter, even a fellow third of fourth tier New Media type like Stacy L. Harp.

I hoped she liked my tweet about my Sunday trout fishing trip.
.

I’ve read about studies on the subject of LGBT healthcare. I know one needs to out oneself when seeing healthcare providers because there are some medical issues associated with being LGBT (here, here, here, and here, for example).

It’s really unlikely that there are any significant intersecting health concerns with my toothache and LGBT status — but in the past I would always out myself to healthcare providers “just in case.”

Yesterday (January 16, 2009), I didn’t. Even being as out as I am about my sexual orientation and gender identity to just about everyone, I didn’t out myself to the unfamiliar, new dentist. I didn’t because I was concerned someone would invoke their right of conscience and decide not to treat me because I’m transsexual…because I’m transgender.

It’s a real worry. Folks who aren’t even trans are already suing the federal government because they believe the regulations were written way, way too broadly. From the Washington Post:

Seven states and two family-planning groups yesterday asked a federal court to block a controversial new federal regulation that protects health workers who refuse to provide care that they find objectionable.

In three lawsuits filed in U.S. District Court in Connecticut, the states and groups sought an immediate court order preventing the regulation from going into effect Tuesday and a permanent decision voiding the rule.

“On the way out, the Bush administration has left a ticking political time bomb that is set to explode literally on the day of the president’s inaugural and blow apart women’s rights,” said Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who filed one of the suits on behalf of his state, California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon and Rhode Island. “This midnight rule is a nightmare for hospitals and clinics, as well as women.”

Blumenthal’s lawsuit challenges the regulation on several grounds, charging that it is too vague and overbroad and conflicts with other federal laws and state laws…

[More below the fold.]

Read the rest of this entry »

If you are a member of an LGBT family with young children, or the friend or the ally of an LGBT family with young children, or your an friend, family member, or ally who wants to expose your children to what the broad, LGBT community looks like, you need to expose yourself and these children to the picture book 10,000 Dresses. This is the first picture book aimed at 5 to 7-year-olds I’m aware of with a transyouth as the main character.

And, 10,000 Dresses is an absolutely beautifully written and illustrated book (written by Marcus Ewert; illustrations by Rex Ray). Frankly, I was expecting a mediocre children’s book when I received a copy to review, and was extremely surprised at the quality of the book — my eyes welled with tears the first three times I read it. From this artsy, trans woman’s perspective: yes, the book is that good. This children’s book is no doubt as important a work as Heather Has Two Mommies, and it certainly is as well done.

In fact, Lesléa Newman, the author of Heather Has Two Mommies, gives a back cover comment for 10,000 Dresses:

Three cheers for Bailey, whose creativity and artistic vision will inspire readers of all ages to celebrate exactly who they are.

The transyouth at the heart of the 10,000 Dresses is a child named Bailey. She’s a child that is being told she’s a boy when she really knows she’s a girl. Each night she dreams of one of 10,000 magical dresses, and each day she tries to figure out a way to have significant people in her life help her obtain a magical dress. Many days she discovers she’s not ever going to have that special dress she imagined in her dreams that night before. The story has a very happy ending — I won’t spoil it by describing it.

Perhaps the most important endorsement of 10,000 Dresses comes from Shannon Garcia, the president of TransYouth Family Allies (TYFA). She wrote a short review of the book for their Recommended Reading section:

10,000 Dresses by Marcus Ewert is a charming tale of a “boy” named Bailey who dreams of wearing dresses. His parents and brother tell him that boys don’t wear dresses and Bailey is sad because she doesn’t feel like a boy. Bailey finally meets a friend that understands the desire to wear dresses and helps her achieve that goal. It is a story with beautiful illustrations by Rex Ray that uses just enough words to say what is needed. I highly recommend it for children of all ages (adults too), although it is definitely a book that would be enjoyed by the under 10 crowd. 10,000 Dresses helps us understand the workings of the gender variant child’s mind from their point of view and it is very nicely done.

10,000 Dresses is a very important book. If you’re involved with LGBT families at all, don’t skip this book. If you have a local bookstore nearby you — especially a local LGBT bookstore — ask them for a copy of the book. If they don’t have a copy, ask them to order you a copy. Hey, you won’t be sorry, and neither will the bookstore.

~~~~~
10,000 Dresses

By: Marcus Ewert
Illustrated by: Rex Ray
Publisher: Seven Stories Press
Hardcover: $14.95

~~~~~
FaceBook: Ten-Thousand Dresses

~~~~~
Further Reading:
* San Francisco Chronicle: ’10,000 Dresses’: A book about gender identity

Let me repeat myself:

I get angry reading about the same tactics over and over again against LGBT civil rights legislation – You just can’t sell me that this isn’t about hate when were seeing these same, hateful “Christian” mistruths and fear tactics used over and over again. When do we develop some good answers to his and his “Christian” peers’ lies and fear tactics?

The ad below, by Citizens for Good Public Policy, is a for a Gainesville, Florida referendum to repeal a civil rights ordinance:

I don’t look like that actor behaving like a predator shown in the ad when I go to use a public restroom; I don’t act like a predator when I go use a public restroom — I just go to the bathroom. So do other trans people. And hey, sexually predatory behavior in any public bathroom is unlawful everywhere in the U.S. — despite what the ad says and the ad implies, the behavior shown in the ad isn’t legal.

If there were documented cases of transpeople having acted like predators in public bathrooms, or documented cases of male predators dressing as women to molest women and children in public bathrooms that organizations like Citizens for Good Public Policy would be citing the cases.

As it is, my trans peers (and I personally) are portrayed as potential predators — facts to support the claims and implications appear not to be needed. Frankly, it sucks raw eggs.

~~
H/t: Queerty

~~~~~
Related:
* White Male Privilege & Women’s Fear Of Crime Intersecting With Gender Expression & Public Restrooms
* When It Comes To Transgender People & Civil Rights, It Really Is Always About The Bathroom
~~
* AFA Michigan’s Gary Glenn Up To The Usual Fear Tactics — This Time In Kalamazoo
* A Further Update: Why A Commission Is Investigating The Suspension Of A Trans Student
* MA Haters Using Prop 8 Celebration to Fundraise Against Trans Rights
* The Ambiguous Feelings About Peeing In Public Restrooms
* The Predator Argument Doesn’t Work With Transgender Fifth Graders
* Kevin Moore’s Take On Colorado’s “Bathroom Police”
* If Dr. Dobson Were King, We’d All Be Wearing Depends
* The Non-Trans Woman Thrown Out Of A NY Women’s Restroom Sues
* Outing #2: When You Endanger A Child For The Sensationalism Of It
* Latest Attacks Of Teh HomoSEXual Agenda’s Transgenderededs’s Bullet Points

I’m referring here to the news coverage of the City of Gainesville, Florida’s anti-discrimination ordinance, which City Commissioners passed just about one year ago.

The Associated Press news story, “Fla. conservatives fight transgender restroom rule” (and there are headline variations) is getting a great deal of attention.  (I follow transgender-related news every day — have for many years — and that’s a lot of attention.)

With the economy going down the toilet, I don’t find it very surprising that many of the folks who cheerleaded for those who brought it on — are ramping up diversionary societal acrimony.

It’s been going on in Montgomery County (Maryland) too, among other places, and I expect it will become (even more so) staple fare for the LaBarberas, the Barbers, the Sheldons and the like.

GAINESVILLE, Fla. (AP) — A blond girl heads from a playground into a women’s restroom. A scruffy man, lurking outside, darts in behind her. ”Your City Commission Made This Legal,” the words on the TV screen read.

The dark ad came from opponents of a gender identity provision added last year to the city’s anti-discrimination ordinance, which now allows the city’s roughly 100 transgender residents to use whichever restroom they’re most comfortable using.

Foes want to repeal the new protection with a March 24 ballot measure that has divided Gainesville, a generally gay-friendly university city surrounded by staunchly conservative north Florida.

Those who support the transgender protections say their opponents are really unleashing a broader attack on the rights of gay, lesbian and transgender individuals in general.

The city commission approved the restroom provision by a 4-3 vote a year ago. Before the ink could dry, Bible-quoting opponents angrily began working for its repeal.

”You are trying to operate in a realm you do not have the authority to operate in,” one pastor, George Brantley, told the commissioners.

The debate is expected to become noisier as the ballot nears with opponents resorting to more TV ads and campaigns pegged to such slogans as ”Keep Men out of Women’s Restrooms and vice versa.”

Organizations defending transgender rights are mustering their own campaign.

The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force notes 108 cities and counties nationwide have similar transgender protections. An attempt to repeal an ordinance in Montgomery County, Md., failed when a court ruled opponents did not collect enough signatures to place it on the ballot.

Citizens for Good Public Policy, the group behind the commercial that aired last summer in Gainesville, collected more than 6,000 signatures last summer to win a referendum. If approved, the repeal measure would also prevent the commission from adding protections beyond what the state requires: race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability and marital status.

Cain Davis, chairman of Citizens for Good Public Policy, said the issue is about regulating a ”government gone wild” and ensuring public safety, charging that sexual predators could now simply enter a women’s restroom claiming to be a transgender individual.

”We know when men go into women’s restrooms, bad things can happen,” Davis said.

City Commissioner Craig Lowe, leader of a group called Equality is Gainesville’s Business, called the ads from Davis’ group a grossly distorted attempt to whip up fears.

Lowe’s group believes anti-discrimination protections for people who change their sexual orientation are good for business and foster diversity. He noted that 433 of the Fortune 500 companies have policies covering sexual orientation and 153 cover gender identity.

Since the ordinance took effect, police have reported no problems in public restrooms stemming from the law.

Retired postal worker Donna Lee, who became a female with surgery in 2001, moved to Gainesville from Ocala last March after hearing about the anti-discrimination ordinance. The 60-year-old is working to save the protections.

”We just want to live our lives with the basic civil rights that everyone else has,” Lee said.

But some are taking no chances.

Computer programmer Clare Holman, who was born male but now lives as a female, said she simply stays away from public toilets.

”I don’t want to run afoul of the law by using the wrong restroom,” Holman said.

——

On the Net:

Equality is Gainesville’s Business: http://equalitygainesville.com

Citizens for Good Public Policy: http://citizensforgoodpublicpolicy.org

~~~~~

Related …

The View From (Ab)Normal Heights

City of Gainesville: Gender Identity Anti-discrimination Ordinance Legislative History (PDF)

City of Gainesville: Meeting Agenda (1/28/08) (PDF) [see pages 40-42]

City Of Gainesville: Ordinance No. 051225 (1/28/08) (PDF)

Transgender ordinance backlash (2/3/08) (St.Petersburg Times)

Some music (from younger days) …

… to listen to while reading this one …

A man undergoes the mutilative procedure known as “gender-reassignment surgery” and then wins the women’s division of golf’s premier long drive championship.

There was a time when a sexual identity crisis was thought a problem of adolescence and only discussed in psychology journals. But now our whole civilization is experiencing one, as we’ve gone from confusion about the roles of the sexes, to a battle of the sexes, to a battle about how significant the category of “sex” actually is, to subordinating it to “gender,” and finally to a battle of the “genders.”

Such a battle has just played out as 55-year-old Lana Lawless (an assumed name), a man who used to be a 245-pound SWAT cop for the city of Rialto, California, has just won the women’s division of the RE/MAX World Long Drive Championship.

Allowing such individuals to compete in women’s athletic contests is nothing new. It dates back to 1977, when Renee Richards (formerly Dr. Richard Raskind) won a court battle that allowed him to compete on the women’s tennis circuit. Now, three decades later, many sporting organizations – including the International Olympic Committee – have rules in place allowing mutilated men to compete alongside women. In other words, we went from altar boys to altered boys in just a couple of generations.

The real problem, however, is that we have an altered society, one thoroughly confused about so many things, not the least of which is the nature of the sexes.

Personally, I don’t refer to any of these altered men as “she.” This is mainly because you cannot change your sex any more than you can your species, and I don’t subscribe to the concept of “gender.” Believe it or not, many altered-men activists agree with me; they will say that while “sex” is inborn, “gender” is chosen. Why do you think the preferred labels today are not “transsexual” and “sex-change operation” but “transgendered” and “gender-reassignment surgery? These terms are part of a social-engineering scheme to alter society’s thinking. They reflect the belief that people have gender (it originally referred only to words) and that it can be whatever your feelings dictate. This is why I won’t use the word gender when referring to people any more than “she” when referring to Lawless. When we use these elements of the lexicon of the left, we unwittingly acknowledge that the concepts they represent are valid.

In other words, there cannot be gender-reassignment surgery because unless “gender” is synonymous with “sex,” it’s not a quality people possess. And there cannot be a sex-change operation because one cannot change his sex. As soon as we deviate from this principle, the form of our argument negates its substance and we help legitimize that against which we fight.

Yet critics tell me I’m uneducated on the matter, that I just don’t understand the science. My response is that they don’t understand the philosophy, without which they can’t interpret the science.

What does it mean to be a man or a woman? Is it just a matter of superficial qualities? Well, good theology tells us that your sex is something existing in your very soul, but I don’t expect this to carry much Lose Weight Exercise with secularists. So instead of delving into what sex is, I’ll explore what it is not.

If a man loseWeight Exercises his genitalia in an accident, is he somehow less male? Or is he just a mutilated male? We know that a pre-pubescent boy has the same hormone balance (low estrogen levels) as a pre-pubescent girl and no male secondary sex characteristics. With his high voice and low muscle mass he is certainly less masculine than his father, but is he any less male than dad?

If that boy lost his genitalia in an accident and thus had none of the three attributes – male primary and secondary sex characteristics and an adult male hormone balance – would he be any less male? This is where critics may say that some elements of femaleness are still missing; for starters, external primary and secondary female sex characteristics would have to be created via surgery and estrogen treatments.

If this were done and the boy dressed and wore his hair like a girl, he’d certainly be able to masquerade as a female very effectively. This point is sometimes made by altered men’s advocates. But does it matter? A great imposter may be indistinguishable from the real thing, but he is no less an imposter.

I would point out that altered men still have an XY (male) chromosome configuration, and, while I won’t boil sex down to just genetics either, it’s certainly more significant than superficial qualities. After all, a boy only develops properly as one because his genes send messages for the release of testosterone in his body while in the womb.

This is where “gender” comes into play. Critics will say that the most significant factor of all is that you must feel like a member of a sex trapped in a body of the other; in other words, you may be physically male but your “gender” is female. The psychobabblers call this “gender dysphoria” – giving something an impressive medical name always lends credibility. And feelings are the ultimate arbiters of reality.

But now consider that the mental health profession has also “identified” a psychological disorder called “body dysmorphia.” Its most extreme manifestation is when a person strongly feels that a certain body part – an arm, leg, etc. – doesn’t belong on his body. He feels it’s alien to him and that he won’t be happy until it’s amputated. There are doctors willing to perform such an operation so that their patients can be “cured.” It’s a remedy prescribed after a brilliant diagnostic process: ascertain if the person truly feels that his body doesn’t conform to what he feels like on the inside. Remember, feelings are the ultimate arbiters of reality.

But here is reality: there may be a man in a psychiatric institution who feels he’s a wolf. He could have his body surgically altered so that he has fur, a tail, paws, fangs and a snout. He could then run about on all fours and howl at the moon, but he would not be a wolf. He would simply be what he is, a troubled man who needs not his body altered, but his mind.

Man Allowed in Women’s Athletic Event . . . and Wins It

No doubt — with the “Socialist Party” firmly back in power in this country — these folks will be meeting in the John … and making a great deal of noise.

~~~~~

Related …

The George Bush Society

Swinging With The Big Shot Women

Back when I was a Pentecostal (waaaaaay back in the 1970′s), I got it drilled into my head what the difference was between saying you’re sorry and repenting. Saying you’re sorry was an admission of doing a wrong thing, while repenting meant you first said you were sorry for what you had done, and then you made a commitment to yourself not to do repeat the act. It didn’t mean you actually never repeated the same type of wrong act again, but it meant that you had the intent of behaving better, and not repeating your bad acts.

So when I hear those “I’m sorry I got caught,” “I’m sorry that you were offended,” or even the “I’m sorry I was wrong” apologies if they don’t come with a “and this is how I plan on changing my behavior” comment — well, I take all of these kinds of apologies with a grain of salt. And, it’s because there’s no real repentance in the apology.

Welcome to the Charlie Stadtlander apology to transgender people and drag queens. Charlie Stadtlander, a former Republican and leader of Log Cabin Republicans groups in Missouri and Atlanta, is planning to run for the District 6 seat on the Atlanta City Council. He’s expected to formally announce his candidacy this week.

From Stadtlander’s statement at Project Q Atlanta:

My views have changed. At the time, I did not know very many transgender people. I was a gay rights lobbyist within the conservative party in Missouri. We all make mistakes. I probably said some things that were ill informed positions.”

That was then — it was four years ago. Times have changed. My views have changed. I want to be very clear that I do not support discrimination against transgender people. I think it is horrible that transgender people are discriminated against, that gay and lesbian people are discriminated against. I fully support any measures, policies, laws or protections for transgender people. I do not think that anybody should be discriminated against and it is a travesty that any transgender people are discriminated against”

So what did Stadtlander say years ago that was so bad? And why, in my opinion, is this apology statement a not-good-enough-for-government-work-apology? Answers below the fold.

Read the rest of this entry »

Late in December, Q-Notes announced their Person of the Year, and that person is North Carolinian Angela Brightfeather. I actually know Angela personally — we’ve met at a number of Southern Comfort Conventions, and we served for awhile together on the Transgender American Veterans Association (TAVA) board.

From Q-Notes:

From her humble home in North Carolina to the doorsteps of national organizations and the halls of Congress, there’s no doubt that Angela Brightfeather has done her part this year.

If there were issues to be discussed, if the transgender community needed an advocate or if the transgender community was being ignored, Brightfeather stepped up.

The 63-year-old transgender leader and activist is a legend — she’s been involved in advocacy work since she was in her 20s; and she’s certainly not afraid of ruffling feathers.

“Anybody who challenges the establishment is going against the flow,” she told Q-Notes. “When you do that, you become the ultimate activist. You become the one that pushes too hard, that wants everybody to take a lead, the one who wants to really change things.” …

One of TAVA’s big accomplishments this year, of which Angela played a significant part in making happen, was a survey done with the Palm Center — The survey was a first ever study at transgender people’s military and veteran experiences.

With regards to Angela’s Person Of The Year honor, TAVA president Monica Helms told me:

“Angela has been my friend for nearly as long as I’ve been an activist, and if anyone deserves this award, it would be her. For 40 years, she has helped our community through some of its toughest times. Her voice has never been silenced, and now, it has been praised.”

Basically, Angela makes a difference for trans people both locally and nationally, and she’s been doing it for quite awhile. Kudos to Angela on her recognition by Q-Notes.

~~~~~
For disclosure purposes, Autumn is a past-Secretary for TAVA.

~~~~~
Related:
* TAVA And The Palm Center: A Look At Transgender Military And Veteran Experiences
* The Transgender American Veterans Association

I get angry reading about the same tactics over and over again against LGBT civil rights legislation – You just can’t sell me that this isn’t about hate when were seeing these same, hateful “Christian” mistruths and fear tactics used over and over again. When do we develop some good answers to his and his “Christian” peers’ lies and fear tactics?

From Pride Source:

KALAMAZOO-Less than one month after the City of Kalamazoo Commission voted 7-0 to adopt an expanded human rights ordinance that makes it illegal to use sexual orientation to discriminate in housing, public accommodations and employment, petitions were filed Dec. 31 to repeal it.

City Clerk Scott Borling said that the circulators of the petition had filed over 1,600 signatures. If at least 1,273 of them are valid city registered voters, it will cause the new ordinance to be suspended immediately.

The city charter states that valid referendum petitions require the commissioners to take up the challenge at the next regular meeting which will be held on Jan. 26. They will either repeal the ordinance or place it on a ballot for city voters to decide. The certification process began Friday and the outcome should be known sometime this week.

The American Family Association of Michigan, led by Gary Glenn and Kalamazoo County Treasurer Mary Balkema, a former City Commissioner, submitted the petitions. Glenn has been quoted in local press claiming that the new ordinance would force some people to base decisions that run counter to their religious convictions, as well as possibly violate the privacy of women and children.

Glenn has led every challenge across the state in the past decade to defeat city ordinances that include sexual orientation and gender identity. A circulated flyer of talking points stated, “This ordinance violates the First Amendment rights of religion and free speech of those who oppose cross-dressing and homosexual behavior.”

Glenn has used scare tactics in other ballot initiatives. For example, the title of one of the petition circulator scripts reads, “IS THERE A MAN IN YOUR DAUGHTER’S BATHROOM?” …

First I rant about a lack of an effective counter argument to the same, tired arguments of the conservative “Christians,” and then I sigh. *Sigh.*

~~~~~
Related:
* A Further Update: Why A Commission Is Investigating The Suspension Of A Trans Student
* MA Haters Using Prop 8 Celebration to Fundraise Against Trans Rights
* The Ambiguous Feelings About Peeing In Public Restrooms
* White Male Privilege & Women’s Fear Of Crime Intersecting With Gender Expression & Public Restrooms
* When It Comes To Transgender People & Civil Rights, It Really Is Always About The Bathroom
* The Predator Argument Doesn’t Work With Transgender Fifth Graders
* Kevin Moore’s Take On Colorado’s “Bathroom Police”
* If Dr. Dobson Were King, We’d All Be Wearing Depends
* The Non-Trans Woman Thrown Out Of A NY Women’s Restroom Sues
* Outing #2: When You Endanger A Child For The Sensationalism Of It
* Latest Attacks Of Teh HomoSEXual Agenda’s Transgenderededs’s Bullet Points

The Los Angeles Times has a recent piece out (December 29, 2008) on how the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, entitled DSM psychiatry manual’s secrecy criticized. The subheader for the piece is The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is being revised under a cloak of confidentiality. Critics say the process needs to be open, and cite potential conflicts of interest. From the article:

An update is underway for the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, known as the DSM, which defines the emotional problems for which doctors prescribe drugs and insurance companies pay the treatment bills. Psychiatrists working on the new edition were required to sign a strict confidentiality agreement.

Critics contend that the American Psychiatric Assn. should allow outside observers to review the scientific debate behind new and revised diagnoses.

Among the most prominent to speak out is the editor of the manual’s third edition, Dr. Robert Spitzer, hailed by peers as the most influential psychiatrist of his generation. If the DSM is often called the profession’s bible, then the DSM-III is the King James Version. Released in 1980, it set the standard by which others are measured.

Recently, Spitzer broke ranks by publishing an open letter to the profession protesting the confidentiality mandate.

A copy of Dr. Spitzer’s open letter is here. Here’s an excerpt from the letter:

[Below the fold, the Spitzer Letter and possible transgender/transsexual related issues behind the lack of transparency.]

Read the rest of this entry »

From GolfMagic.com‘s Long drive champ had a sex change:

TV golf-watchers in the US sat aghast over Christmas when it was revealed that the winner of the RE/MAX world long driving championship for women – shown on the ESPN network – was a former male policeman who used to play off a plus one handicap.

The new women’s world champion is 55-year-old bartender Lana Lawless from Palm Springs, California whose longest drive into a 40 mph headwind at the Mesquite event travelled 254 yards to beat reigning champion Phillis Meti (21) from New Zealand by four yards.

The rules governing transgender golf competition allow for those like Ms Lawless, who have received a ‘sex-change’ operation to take part in such events as long as they provide mandatory doctor reports, lab results within normal female limits and onsite testing…

Let’s be clear: Lawless didn’t beat previous winner Phillis Meti by much at all.

Having lost a significant amount of upper body strength myself in the last six years, I know on a personal level that after a short period of time, having a male history provides one no athletic advantage. Most male-to-female transsexuals loseWeight Exercise a significant amount of muscle mass as a result of blocking or removing the testosterone from their natal testicles, and actually over the period of just two years after genital reconstruction surgery, male-to-female transsexuals have no competitive advantage over natal women.

However, it’s always going to be said in any competition in which male-to-female transsexuals compete that they have a competitive advantage due to their male history — their male genetics. It doesn’t need to be true to be repeated over and over again.

San Francisco State University ‘s Family Acceptance Project released a report which is highlighted in Pediatrics, the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). The article, entitled Family Rejection as a Predictor of Negative Health Outcomes in White and Latino Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Young Adults was posted today (December 29, 2008).

From the Prevention Researcher blog article Supporting the Families of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth on the study:

For this article, the researchers used a retrospective study design with 224 white and Latino LGB young adults ages 21 to 25 years. Participants were evenly distributed across gender and ethnicity, and all lived in California. The study measured how specific family behaviors that parents, caregivers, and guardians use to reject their adolescent’s LGB identity (between ages 13-19), relates to negative mental health, substance use and misuse, and risky sexual behavior in young adulthood.

Results of the study indicated that when compared to their peers from families with no or low levels of family rejection, the lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults who reported high levels of family rejection during adolescence were:

• 8.4 times more likely to report attempting suicide
• 5.9 times more likely to report high levels of depression
• 3.4 times more likely to report illegal drug use
• 3.4 times more likely to report having engaged in unprotected sexual intercourse

Additionally, when the sample was broken down by gender and ethnicity, young Latino gay and bisexual men reported higher levels of family rejection and higher rates of negative mental health and HIV risk outcomes than the other subgroups in the study.

The conclusion of this report is as follows (as taken from the Pediatrics article):

This study establishes a clear link between specific parental and caregiver rejecting behaviors and negative health problems in young lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Providers who serve this population should assess and help educate families about the impact of rejecting behaviors. Counseling families, providing anticipatory guidance, and referring families for counseling and support can help make a critical difference in helping decrease risk and increasing well-being for lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth.

As bad as the outcomes are for family rejection of LGBT youth are, there is hope. I spoke to the Family Acceptance Project (FAP) director Caitlin Ryan today, she said the organization has 8,000 pages of data on the families of LGBT youth, data that’s been collected in English, Chinese, and Spanish. Future papers based on the FAP data won’t just focus on “negative outcomes,” but will show specifically how families can achieve better outcomes for their LGBT children. FAP’s sees the following potentials in their work:

• Significantly improve the health, mental health and quality of life for ethnically diverse LGBT children and their families.

• Strengthen diverse families, decrease social stigma and help maintain many LGBT children and adolescents in their homes who would otherwise end up out-of-home and homeless.

• Substantially reduce the cost of care, personal suffering and loss to society by preventing major negative outcomes in at risk children and adolescents.

For example, the fast majority of parents love their children, and even measures like sending children to ex-gay camps to “cure” the youth of their gender variance or sexual orientation are most often done because the parents want the best outcome for their children. When parents see what the outcomes are for rejecting their children, many, many parents change their behavior — Parents don’t want their children to use drugs or engage in unsafe sexual intercourse, and when shown that there are diffent behaviors they can engage in that create better outcomes with their children, they very often embrace the new behaviors.

I’m excited to that specific papers addressing issues regarding transgender and gender variant youth are in process. Already, some of the findings from their data have been included in the book The Transgender Child: A Handbook for Families and Professionals (by Stephanie A. Brill and Rachel Pepper).

Keep your eye out for more from SFSU’s Family Acceptance Project — I know I’m excited about what the papers’ findings are going to be, and what their recommendations are going to be. I’ll be posting on their upcoming papers as these are released.

How many acts of violence does it take for acts of violence against a class of people to be considered an epidemic of violence against this class of people? How many acts of violence against this class of people must occur without police solving these crimes to be considered a rash of unsolved crimes against this class of people?

I don’t know. I do know that three violent crimes against trans women of color in the same Tennessee city within the past six months where two of the victims died…when one of the victims was beaten by police while in police custody a few months earlier. I do know it leaves me wondering what the City of Memphis itself, and the people in the City of Memphis are doing to protect the lives of its trans citizens of color, and what the city is planning on doing in the future to stop the violence…to stop the killings.

From the Tennessee Transgender Political Coalition (TTPC) press release, entitled Another Transgender Woman Shot in Memphis:

On Christmas Eve, a Memphis television station reported the shooting of Leeneshia Edwards in Memphis. She becomes the third transgender woman shot in Memphis in just six months. At last report, Leeneshia is in critical condition. We extend our hopes and prayers to Leenashia for a speedy recovery.

We also ask for anyone with any information about this latest crime to call Memphis Crimes Stoppers at (901)528-CASH.

The shooting of Leeneshia Edwards helps shed light on a disturbing trend in Memphis. Transgender women who work in the sex industry in order to survive are now being targeted by a pervasive culture of violence.

The indifferent attitude of law enforcement towards the February 16, 2006, murder of Tiffany Berry, and the February 12, 2008, beating of Duanna Johnson by Memphis Police Department officers, has sent a message that the lives of transgender people are not important. This has fed the culture of violence that has permeated the second half of 2008, and is exemplified by the July 1 murder of Ebony Whitaker, the July 28 murder of Dre-Ona Blake, a two year old girl who was killed by the man who had previously been charged with the murder of Tiffany Berry, but was allowed to walk free for two and a half years, the November 9 murder of Duanna Johnson, and now the shooting of Leeneshia Edwards.

This open season on transgender people in Memphis and elsewhere, regardless of whether or not they engage in sex work, must come to an end right now.

[The rest of the TTPC media release text is below the fold, where the TTPC spells out what actions need to be taken in Memphis.]

Read the rest of this entry »