When I began my transition in 2003, I remember having days where I didn’t pass as my target female sex. I remember once being in a Veteran’s Administration Medical Center parking lot, and a child pointing at me, saying to his mom “That’s a man!”
Ouch. As I drove out of the parking lot on my way home, I remember crying about the reality that I didn’t pass as Autumn. I knew that the process of changing from male-to-female (or female-to male, for that matter) is called a transition for a reason — changes that allowed one to live as invisibly in one’s target sex don’t occur overnight. Emotionally, it was tough to live as my target sex but often be perceived as my natal sex.
How important is it to be photogenic to the general public when one identifies as LGBT? Should we, as a community, ever exclude emasculate appearing lesbian women, effeminate appearing gay men, drag queens, genderqueers, and non-passing transmen and transwomen from the LGBT community because they might not look straight? The obvious answer seems no, but the PC answer and reality sometimes clash.
The question of straight appearance is a question that’s recently come up in San Diego. San Diego LGBT Pride Director Ron deHarte was quoted indirectly regarding drag queens after James Hartline, Set Free Ministries, and the Thomas More Law Center made a big deal about Pride buying a thousand ticket block for last Sunday’s Padre game. The article had a some comment on the subject of appearance that reads as follows:
San Diego Pride is promoting the night as “Out in Petco Park” and the Gay Men’s Chorus of San Diego will perform the national anthem before the game, which will be shown on ESPN.
San Diego Pride’s response to the hubbub: It’s people enjoying a game together, not a drag show.
“We’re going to be wearing ball caps and jerseys. That’s the extent of the lifestyle they will be seeing,” Pride Executive Director Ron deHarte said.
My friend Brenda Watson called up deHarte on July 10th to ask if he actually made the drag show comment, or if it was something the reporter writing the story misinterpreted. Brenda told me that deHarte said he did make the comment, but he didn’t think it was that big of a deal — more was being made of it than should be.
And, maybe deHarte is right. I don’t know any drag queens who’d even consider going to a Padre ballgame in full drag, and probably most LGBT Padre fans would be just going to the game wearing Padre gear and rooting for the team as deHarte said. Appropriate wear for a specific events doesn’t go out the window just because one is LGBT.
But, of course, the possible hidden implication of deHarte’s drag show comment is that if one is LGBT, how photogenic or straight looking one appears in public spaces really matters. It’s not the message that it matters how one dresses given the “dress code” of a specific event/venue, but the broader message that it might matter how one appears overall — if one is male, perhaps one should look masculine; if one is female, perhaps one should look feminine.
As a transwoman who has paid some dues as a non-passing transwoman, I don’t like the idea of a message that says how much I pass as female at a public event should be a consideration for how much I’m accepted personally into the public LGBT community.
I’m just not sure though if deHarte’s message was about wearing event appropriate clothing to a ballgame, or about being straight appearing when in view of the general public. Given the history of discrimination against the LGBT community, especially for those who don’t conform to gender norms, I wish deHarte would have just left out the comment on “drag shows” in the first place.
—————
Note: James Hartline is scheduled to be on the Bill O’Reily show tonight discussing San Diego Pride.