Homogenizing Out The Broader LGBT Community’s Contributions To Stonewall
June 9th, 2008 by Autumn Sandeen
As we enter the Pride month I for one hope the community takes a moment to reflect back on all the effort put forth by gay men and women in the past to secure the freedom and acceptance we currently enjoy today. Fighting during a period in time where it was hazardous to one’s physical health to be on the forefront. Stonewall was not simply an activist protest where they went home afterwards and partied. They were beaten and dragged away to jail by the police. It was a time when fag bashing was an accepted method of controlling homos and keeping them out of the neighborhood. There were no drag queens there at all. It was gay human beings simply standing up for being who they were. Making a stand even though they fully knew the dangers of doing so. That’s true courage no different than that on a battlefield.
–Joseph DaBrow, Metroline (Late May, 2008)
Some of the “broad us” at Stonewall were drag queens; some of the “broad us” at Stonewall were transgender and/or transsexual people (even if those words weren’t terms used to describe gender variant people at the time); and some of the “broad us” at Stonewall didn’t publicly identify as gay women, but as lesbians. It’s been well documented that the “broad us” of Stonewall protestors included a broad swath of LGBT people.
Joseph DaBrow’s commentary on Pride Month is an objectionable to those of us who are proud that it wasn’t only gay human beings simply standing up for being who they were, but instead know it was LGBT people standing up for who they were and who we are.
As a term, gay isn’t always seen as inclusive of us all, and in this case gay isn’t an adequate description of who was there at Stonewall.
So in this case, my peers and I are also making a stand: we will not stand by to be quietly homogenized away from the civil rights and social justice implications of Stonewall; we don’t accept being hidden behind a non-inclusive use of the term gay.
Frankly, it’s not in the best interest of those of us whose civil rights depend on the language of gender identity and expression being included in civil rights legislation to accept it when our members’ contributions to our broad community’s history are being in any way minimized or erased.
Posted in LGB civil rights, LGBT, civil rights, employment - housing - public accomodation, law and legislation, lesbian, transactivism, transgender, transgender civil rights |
June 10th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
Autumn will be linking to your excellent post with gratitude NO they will not erase us. no way , no how.
will end what could be a rant here so i can with H/T get your writing broadcasted its all about the message
with gratitude pptg
June 11th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
[...] by Jack Stephens on June 11, 2008 Autumn Sandeen blogs about an article written by Joseph DaBrow who stated, “It was a time when fag bashing was an accepted method [...]
June 11th, 2008 at 5:14 pm
[...] Sandeen blogs about an article written by Joseph DaBrow who stated, “It was a time when fag bashing was an accepted method [...]
June 14th, 2008 at 5:25 am
Terrific!!! Amen. Amen!!! As a Gay Drag Queen, I’m utterly astonished and dismayed at the mainstreaming of Stonewall. Keep it up.