Categories

Search

Tom-Boys Allowed; Jane-Girls Not Allowed

December 12th, 2007 by Autumn Sandeen

Lambda Legal released a press release of a new lawsuit, filed in the Northern District Court of Indiana regarding West Side High School (Gary, Indiana) violated Kevin “K.K.” Logan’s First Amendment rights when it barred him from his prom for wearing a dress.

From the press release:

K.K. Logan attended West Side High during his junior and senior year and expressed a deeply rooted femininity in his appearance and demeanor. Both classmates and teachers at the school supported him in his daily attendance dressed in clothes typically associated with girls his age.

However, on May 19, 2006, Principal Diane Rouse stretched her arms across the door of the Senior Prom, blocking Logan’s entrance. His classmates and friends rallied to his defense to no avail — even though a female student was allowed entrance dressed in a tuxedo.

The message here is that being a male-bodied person in a dress — a Jane-Girl — is as bad as using drugs. That’s right — according to school policy, one can’t wear clothing that “advertises” drugs or sexual orientation. And let’s be clear, that means a female-bodied person wearing a tux isn’t advertising sexual orientation, but a male-bodied person wearing a prom dress is advertising sexual orientation. The policy is excerpted in the press release:

Principal Rouse has stood by a school policy that deems inappropriate any “clothing/ accessories that advertise sexual orientation, sex, drugs, alcohol, tobacco, profanity, negative social or negative educational statements.”

Lambda Legal’s public response (besides filing the lawsuit):

“The fact that sexual orientation is lumped in with drugs and profanity in the school’s dress code is just plain offensive, but even more troublesome is that the whole policy is in violation of students’ First Amendment rights,” said James P. Madigan, Staff Attorney in Lambda Legal’s Midwest Regional Office in Chicago. “There are ways to write policies that both create rules for student behavior and also respect their rights — but this isn’t one of them.”

Lambda Legal argues that Logan’s First Amendment rights were violated, including the freedoms of speech, symbolic action, and expressive conduct. The school district also engaged in unlawful discrimination on the basis of sex and gender.

K.K. Logan ended the press release with a significant statement:

I dress this way because it’s who I am and how I feel on the inside. Gay and trans students have rights, and they should be treated fairly.

Posted in LGB civil rights, LGBT, Lambda Legal, civil rights, diversity, education, gender equality, goverment bureaucracy, hate crimes and hate violence, in the media, politics, prejudice: racism-sexism-homophobia-transphobia-etc, transactivism, transgender, transgender civil rights |

2 Responses

  1. proudprogressive Says:

    wow this is a very important case,and finally TY for giving me the frame of reference i needed for language, a “jane girl” . As a TG tomboy,lesbian, I have always been able to cross dress, as we know bio males who are TS/TG get walloped so disportionally - it is truly truly one of our most pressing civil rights issues. I will watch this case with great interest. My heart goes out to my TS mtf sisters. And horray for the youth and their courage. They make us proud.

  2. Paul Decelles Says:

    The fact that at least some of Logan’s classmates provided support is a hopeful sign. Hmmm I thought proms were all about advertising sexual orientation. Besides that principle needs a little education about gender expression and identity vs sexual orientation.