The HRC’s Bad ENDA Behavior — And A Cover-Up?
November 5th, 2007 by Autumn SandeenHypocrisy. It’s detestable in elected officials, it’s detestable in religious right organizations, and it’s particularly detestable in any of our LGBT non-profits and civil rights organizations. So, seeing the HRC caught late last week supporting a non-inclusive ENDA on their website after saying the organization wouldn’t — it leaves a particularly bad taste in my mouth. But worse yet, after being discovered supporting a non-inclusive ENDA on their website, it appears they attempted to cover up their bad behavior.
Let me digress a bit. Monica Roberts spelled out in a clear and cogent Pam’s House Blend diary why many transgender people are no fans of the HRC; I previously wrote in a Pam’s House Blend diary that I wanted a divorce from the HRC; Monica and I don’t like the apparent anti-transgender behavior and public duplicity that has, with regards to transgender people, colorfully checkered the HRC’s past.
Well, more recently, the HRC recently stated that it wouldn’t support ENDA without “perceived gender” protections:
On Monday [October 2, 2007], the HRC Board of Directors voted to affirm its 2004 decision not to support a version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act that does not explicitly include protections based on gender identity. We do not support the current version of ENDA that is being considered by the House, and are not advocating for it on the Hill.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if that were completely true.
Marti Abernathey at TransAdvocate.com wrote a piece entitled HRC’s Bait and Switch. She highlighted that the HRC was as recently as November 1st was…
…passing off HR. 3685 as transgender inclusive (it’s not, gender identity has NEVER been included in 3685) , and asking people to support it! So much for their claim of not supporting 3685, but not opposing it. This is FULL FRONTAL SUPPORT.
If one follow the links in TransAdvocate.com’s article; however, one would find that the webpages Marti referenced have been taken down — apparently, the HRC noted that their webpages indicate hypocritical behavior, and noted that their hypocrisy had been exposed.
Unfortunately for the HRC, Google and MSN caches of the ENDA Take Action and passendanow.org pages were still available (passendanow.org comparison: October 29th cache; November 1st cache).
So much for damage control.
So here’s what the HRC said on the now downed pages. On the ENDA Take Action Page, the HRC said:
The U.S. House of Representatives will vote on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) in a matter of days. Now is the time to call your Member of Congress and tell them to vote for H.R. 2015. The capitol switchboard number is 202-225-3121.
Watch this video to learn more about why ending workplace discrimination is so important.
That’s right. In 31 states, it’s still legal to fire someone because they’re gay; and in 39 states it is legal to fire someone for being transgender.
Thousands of hardworking GLBT Americans have lost their livelihoods simply because of who they are. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is a federal bill that would make it illegal to fire, refuse to hire, or refuse to promote employees simply based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
This historic legislation will be up for a vote soon in the U.S. House. But the radical right is flooding lawmakers with misinformation about ENDA.
You can set the facts straight. Call your lawmakers at 202-225-3131 and make sure they know passing ENDA is the American thing to do.
In a link at the bottom of that statement — a link that took one to passendanow.org — the HRC’s letter read on November 1st as follows:
Dear [Decision Maker],
As your constituent, and a Human Rights Campaign Supporter, I’m writing you to share my strong support for HR 3685, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, legislation that protects GLBT Americans against discrimination in the workplace.
(Edit Letter Below)
I know you share my belief in the right of all American workers to be judged by their qualifications, and their job performance - not by the color of their skin, the name of their religion, or the country of their birth.But, in 31 states, it’s still legal to fire someone because they’re gay - and in 39 states, it’s legal to fire someone for being transgender.
In a country founded upon the principle of equal opportunity, it’s time to put an end to this injustice. Corporate America has already taken significant steps toward this goal, with almost 90% of Fortune 500 Companies now including sexual orientation in their non-discrimination policies.
Please support equal employment rights for all Americans.
Sincerely,
[Your name]
[Your address]
This post isn’t about playing “Gotcha.” It also isn’t about taking the eyes off the goal of a fully inclusive ENDA. However, it is about holding the HRC accountable for saying one thing and doing another — and then engaging in what a first glance appears to be a cover up their untenable actions by deleting pages after the bad behavior was pointed out on TransAdvocate.com.
Is it any wonder that transgender people hold the HRC in such low regard?
The broad LGBT community — and not just the transgender community — deserve more straightforward behavior from the HRC than they’ve been demonstrating.
~~
I requested a statement from the HRC for this story prior to posting, but didn’t receive a response.
~~
Crossposted to/from Pam’s House Blend.
Posted in Blogroll, HRC, LGB civil rights, LGBT, civil rights, diversity, employment - housing - public accomodation, in the media, law and legislation, politics, transactivism, transgender, transgender civil rights |
November 6th, 2007 at 11:33 am
I am so furious , and commend you on your cogent post. I am livid. The HRC , if we gave them the benefit of the doubt with this last stunt. Its gone. Dammit i loath being played and jerked around. see i am …well thank you Autumn because i linked this post to my lastest post which is about the Donna Rose youtube project. Which i found also thanks to you.
I just cannot believe this is going down. LIED TOO outright. correct me if i am wrong..but they just lied their asses off in huge internet campaign saying they would not support a non inclusive bill “give em another chance, make it right” and now say NO they don’t ! get all those signatures..I feel so had.
christ for some one with no words i sure got em. /end rant now.
November 6th, 2007 at 11:36 am
and took the pages down , a complete cover up..omfg !